Skip to content

Category: Chronology

Bible Inerrancy Falls Victim to Tradition

A Discussion of Chronological Method in Evangelical Scholarship Evangelical biblical scholarship has long affirmed the authority and inerrancy of Scripture while simultaneously employing methodological devices—such as undocumented co-regencies and conjectural scribal error—to resolve chronological tensions in the regnal data of Israel and Judah. This paper examines the methodological implications of…

Re-examining the Traditional Foundations of Ancient Near Eastern Chronology

Preface: This topic is important because every timeline taught in modern seminaries and found in popular study Bibles is based on an incorrect secular Assyrian chronology that anchors all Ancient Near Eastern (ANE) timelines. Abstract This article re-examines the assumptions underlying Ancient Near East chronology prior to the year 745…

When Time Became a Battleground

How Doctrinal Chronology Made Science LoseRespect for the Authority of Scripture The Early Spirit of Inquiry For most of Christian history, biblical chronology was not a closed dogma but a living branch of scholarship. Medieval and early modern thinkers regarded the Bible as a record of real events set in…

Dispensational Eschatology: A Modern Theory Built on Assumptions Rather Than Scripture

Introduction  In my commentary Daniel Unsealed, I explain in detail that all of the prophecies in the Book of Daniel have been fulfilled, with the final prophetic fulfillment being realized in 1967 when Jerusalem returned to Jewish sovereignty exactly as foretold in Daniel 8:13-14. That work established the historical, chronological,…